Invertir y Especular,1 junio 2020 .
Que Gustazo, Que Orgasmo Visual es Ver como se Mueve así de Teóricamente Correcta la Cotización de un Activo, Sea Cual Fuere.
En este caso es Pharmamar que hoy hace nuevos máximos no vistos hace muchísimo tiempo en una revalorización bien merecida, además con esto del COVID19 ha ganado mucho caché internacional al punto que hay más dinero en la empresa de fuera de España que de dentro y así también empezaba Grifols en su día al despertar más interés de fuera que de dentro que incluso grandes manos hicieron que se decidieran por ella con compras a largo plazo de las que están obteniendo excelentes Rentabilidades.
Si alguno piensa que nos montamos al caballo cuando es ganador decir que en su momento cuando dimos objetivo 9 euros al ver un batman invertido nos ganamos todo tipo de insultos por parte de los respectivos haters de la página que para nosotros por cierto son un lujo porque implica que estamos subiendo, un blog sin haters es como un jardín sin flores, porque para nosotros son como abejas, vienen ellos creen que revientan la página o la moral del administrador y lo que hacen es polinizarla ya que luego gracias a ellos vienen otros usuarios y se dan cuenta que no es tan mala como los haters decían y nos añaden a sus favoritos.
Por lo Qué Hasta la Obtención de los Resultados Completos ... Más la Elaboración del Dossier ... Más la Evaluación de las Agencias ... Nos Podemos Ir al 2027 .
02 junio 2020
Lurbinectedin / EEUU / Lung Cancer . Analista de SVB Leerink, Ami Fadia se Basa en el Potencial del Fármaco para Analizar a Jazz Pharmaceuticals .
Un Fármaco al que JazzPharma Valoró en MIL MILLONES $$ Como Monto a Abonar a Pharmanar Solo para el Mercado EstadoUnidense.
Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ya Abono 200 Millones a la Firma del Acuerdo ... Abonará otros 250 Millones el Día en que la FDA lo Apruebe ... Y el Resto los Abonaría Vía Hitos a Conseguir .
Por las Posibles Ventas Abonaría Alrededor del 30 % en Royalties y además JazzPharma Compraría el Compuesto a Pharmamar .
Lurbinectedin Successful Second-line Treatment for Small-cell Lung Cancer Patients After First-line Failure .
By Kaitlyn D’Onofrio -June 1, 2020 .
The Trial included adult patients from 26 hospitals in the U.S. and six countries in Europe with a pathologically proven SCLC diagnosis. Eligibility criteria included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, measurable disease using the Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, no brain metastasis, and adequate organ function. All patients were treated only with one prior line of chemotherapy at least three weeks prior to the start of the study. Every three weeks, patients received 3.2 mg/m2 lurbinectedin intravenously for one hour until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The main outcome was patients with an overall (complete or partial) response, which was evaluated by investigator assessment.
The Results of the Study Were Published in The Lancet Oncology.
Lurbinectedin Could Represent a Potencial New Treatment For Patients with SCLC, Who Have Few Options Especially in the Event of a Relapse, and is Being Investigated in Combination with Doxorubicin as Second-Line Therapy in a Randomized Phase 3 Trial,” the Study Authors Concluded.
Lurbinectedin May Be a Viable Option As a Second-Line Treatment For Small-Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) Patients Whose First-Line Therapy Was Unsuccessful, A Study Found.
“Few Options Exist for Treatment of Patients With Small-Cell lung Cáncer (SCLC) After Failure of First-Line Therapy. Lurbinectedin is a Selective Inhibitor of Oncogenic Transcription. In this Phase 2 Study, we Evaluated the Efficacy and Safety of Lurbinectedin in Patients with SCLC After Failure of Platinum-based Chemotherapy,” the Researchers Wrote.
The Trial included adult patients from 26 hospitals in the U.S. and six countries in Europe with a pathologically proven SCLC diagnosis. Eligibility criteria included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, measurable disease using the Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, no brain metastasis, and adequate organ function. All patients were treated only with one prior line of chemotherapy at least three weeks prior to the start of the study. Every three weeks, patients received 3.2 mg/m2 lurbinectedin intravenously for one hour until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The main outcome was patients with an overall (complete or partial) response, which was evaluated by investigator assessment.
Final Analysis included 105 Lurbinectedin-treated patients who were followed for a median 17.1 months. Per investigator assessment, overall response was achieved by 37 patients (35.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 26.2% to 45.2%). Hematological abnormalities were the most commonly cited grade 3 to 4 adverse events (AEs), in particular Anemia (9%), Leucopenia (29%), neutropenia (46%), and Thrombocytopenia (7%). Eleven patients (10%) presented serious treatment-related AEs, primarily Neutropenia (5%) Febrile Neutropenia (5%). There were no Treatment-related Deaths.
Lurbinectedin Was Active as Second-Line Therapy for SCLC in Terms of Overall Response and Had an Acceptable and Manageable Safety Profile.
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)