Patients And Methods : This analysis compared the outcomes of patients in DeLLphi-301 who received TARLATAMAB 10 mg (n = 97) with patients in real-world cancer clinics captured in the Flatiron Health database who received third or later-line comparator therapies for SCLC (n = 184) . Propensity score weighting was used to adjust for differences in key prognostic factors between cohorts .
Overall survival ( OS ), progression-free survival ( PFS ), time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), time to next treatment or death (TTNTD), and objective response rate (ORR) were compared after weighting .
Results : TARLATAMAB was associated with significantly longer OS, PFS, TTD, and TTNTD, and higher ORR versus comparator therapies . After weighting, the hazard ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) of tarlatamab versus comparator therapies were 0.45 (0.30, 0.68) for OS, 0.61 (0.43, 0.90) for PFS, 0.57 (0.39, 0.84) for TTD, and 0.45 (0.30, 0.66) for TTNTD . The odds ratio for ORR was 2.80 (95% CI: 1.44, 5.83) .
CONCLUSIÓN :
THE STUDY FINDINGS SUGGEST THAT TARLATAMAB OFFERS POTENTIAL CLINICAL BENEFITS RELATIVE TO COMPARATOR TREATMENTS .
THIS ANALYSIS UNDERSCORES THE POTENTIAL OF TARLATAMAB TO BECOME A NEW THERAPEUTIC OPTION FOR PREVIOUSLY TREATED SCLC, A DISEASE THAT HAS HISTÓRICALLIY BEEN ASSOCIATED WITH EXTREMELY POOR OUTCOMES AND LÍMITED TREATMENT OPTIONS .